|
|
|
|
| Re: some comments |
Thanks, John, for your important elaboration and clarification. And for mercifully glossing over my failure to include "amount of slip" in my explanation of magnitude. The situation isn't quite as simple as I tried to portray it. Michael Williams Follow Ups: ● it was mostly accurate - John Vidale 17:13:21 - 9/22/2006 (40702) (0) ● Re: some comments - chris in suburbia 10:24:53 - 9/22/2006 (40698) (2) ● Re: some comments - Cathryn 17:30:03 - 9/24/2006 (40836) (2) ● Re: some comments - Canie 21:07:17 - 9/25/2006 (40950) (2) ● maybe here? - John Vidale 21:45:17 - 9/25/2006 (40954) (1) ● Re: maybe here? - Canie 23:40:15 - 9/25/2006 (40961) (0) ● Re: some comments - Canie 21:17:33 - 9/25/2006 (40952) (1) ● Re: The Internet (and by proxy usenet, www, email, and chat) - Roger Hunter 22:13:08 - 9/25/2006 (40958) (1) ● Re: The Internet (and by proxy usenet, www, email, and chat) - Canie 23:41:47 - 9/25/2006 (40962) (1) ● Re: The Internet (and by proxy usenet, www, email, and chat) - Roger Hunter 08:21:11 - 9/26/2006 (40965) (0) ● magnitude estimation - John Vidale 20:56:17 - 9/24/2006 (40840) (1) ● Re: magnitude estimation - Cathryn 22:20:24 - 9/24/2006 (40842) (0) ● Re:Thanks for all the comments - Jane 17:21:36 - 9/24/2006 (40835) (0) |
|
|
|
|
