Cal, please learn to read what is actually written and not what you think someone might be accusing you of.

I *DID NOT* accuse you of altering anything re your "water dream". In fact, in my post I went out of my way to clarify that I wasn't making any such accusation.

But back to the main point...

Your intent is obviously to lend credence to the announcement of your prediction after the quake actually occured, but in fact the method does not do any such thing.

I looked at your post on EEC and on syzygy, and both posts are time stamped AFTER the quake occured. Within your posts you pasted the contents of an email you sent to yourself dated prior to the quake. The problem is that there is no way for any of us to verify the authenticity of said email.

Again, I *AM NOT* saying the email is not authentic. I am simply saying that your method of posting the contents of an email to yourself does not in any way verify the prediction's authenticity. Since it *IS* possible to forge such contents, it cannot be relied upon as a way of verifying the authenticity of the prediction.

In case I'm still not clear, let's turn it around...

Let's say a significant earthquake occurs. Several hours later I post the contents of an email I sent to myself days before which details a prediction for that earthquake. Can you trust me (or anyone?) to not have forged that alleged email?

Brian