|
|
|
|
| Re: Strange, weird |
Even as the area continues to settle from the 9.2? I would think the aftershocks from that might go on for years, and a 6.0 could definitely be part of an aftershock sequence, which would skew the odds. I'm not trying to debunk what is going on with Jane, just trying to get a bead on whether Roger would consider a 6.0 in that area a new quake or an aftershock. Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: Strange, weird - Roger Hunter 16:05:38 - 7/27/2006 (39655) (1) ● For example, for 2003-2006/7/15 - Roger Hunter 16:57:58 - 7/27/2006 (39658) (1) ● Re: For example, for 2003-2006/7/15 - Cathryn 17:10:56 - 7/27/2006 (39660) (1) ● Re: For example, for 2003-2006/7/15 - Roger Hunter 17:46:44 - 7/27/2006 (39663) (1) ● Re: For example, for 2003-2006/7/15 - Skywise 21:55:22 - 7/27/2006 (39667) (1) ● Re: For example, for 2003-2006/7/15 - Canie 07:27:51 - 7/29/2006 (39688) (0) |
|
|
|
|
