Re: To Anti-Chicken Man
Posted by cal on July 21, 2006 at 18:23:01:

Is everything you write completely researched from scratch on your own? No, you reference the work of others. You're book on JOB does that. Should I complain about you're constant references in that book to the work of others and claim that "you seem to lack originality"?
As for your remarks about science and health, you obviously haven't the first clue about how science works.

"And, I can't resist this one. In disaster films ever notice how the underdog or the scientist who is a maverick always is right? Brian, often fiction mirrors real life."

And fiction is often just that, fiction. You think a work of fiction is a good reference to base an argument on? It's a story. It's not real life. It's FANTASY.


Follow Ups:
     ● ad hominem - Skywise  18:46:05 - 7/21/2006  (39461)  (2)
        ● What science are you involved in? - Glen  21:15:34 - 7/21/2006  (39465)  (1)
           ● Re: What science are you involved in? - Skywise  00:42:33 - 7/22/2006  (39473)  (1)
              ● Sound well rounded - Glen  12:05:08 - 7/22/2006  (39484)  (0)
        ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal   20:25:13 - 7/21/2006  (39463)  (1)
           ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise  00:30:37 - 7/22/2006  (39472)  (1)
              ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Callie  10:26:32 - 7/22/2006  (39482)  (2)
                 ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise  15:56:01 - 7/22/2006  (39486)  (1)
                    ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - cal  17:22:43 - 7/22/2006  (39487)  (1)
                       ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Skywise  20:25:37 - 7/22/2006  (39490)  (0)
                 ● Re: P.S. Triple Posts. and Tunnel Vision - Roger Hunter  12:02:52 - 7/22/2006  (39483)  (0)