Have no time please..
Posted by R.Shanmugasundaram on July 19, 2006 at 11:11:06:

Roger

May be your evaluation is 100% correct but no one can enter into it. Since our goal is to
find out a method from many experimental methods and find out a suitable method for quake
prediction. Find out the success rate in each and every one's method and if we combine
we reach our goal. Simply your comments like "out of range" (though fulfilling 2 out of 3
parameters) and "That's a hit, but aftershocks don't count." (even if the 3 parameters
came true).

Please note that I have little time and now I exhausted it for debate. So if you feel
my predictions are no use, please leave it as it is. Thank you.

Shan
-


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Have no time please.. - Roger Hunter  11:33:24 - 7/19/2006  (39411)  (0)