|
|
|
|
| Re: Bay area 3.4-6m immed |
Hi Martin, This time I tend to agree with Alan. Even 3.7-6 is a bit broad, when you consider the energy release differential between a 3.7 and a 6. Care to tighten it up a bit more? Cathryn Follow Ups: ● Re: Bay area 3.4-6m immed - Roger Musson 08:20:10 - 11/13/2000 (3938) (1) ● Re: Big Dog... - martin 23:17:52 - 11/14/2000 (3950) (0) |
|
|
|
|
