You mention that this Theory was explained to you. Can you tell us by whom? My hypothesis, which I call a Theory (*violation of scientific principles by me) is more like guesswork and hunches.....Tim Kelleys Dew Point 'Theory' is still his hypothesis. A true Theory is something which can be replicated on a fairly constant basis by others......

My ideas about geomagnetism and relationship with solar are hypothesis...and very much fall in the realm of biology as well as science. I ask questions of pros in thier respective feilds...for example Dr. Jon Dobson who has been VERY understanding of some of my ideas...I am humbled that he would pay attention....His works ranks with the top professionals in his field. My top Seismologist, Richard Stead, had for me, the misfortune of becoming the feller in charge of the United Nations Nuclear Proliferation group. Since he was nominated a few years ago, I lost contact with him and I suspect it is due to security reasons, *BUT* Stead was the consumate expert in his various fields and one who suggested magnetite to me(*although I was already working on that area), as he worked with others in this field which overlapped.
A good site:

http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/ncrrprog/btdir/bt-c.htm

And lots more.....but the puzzle you present in this area intrigues me..... and I only question whether this is a true Theory or still a hypothesis..

Respectfully, Bob