Hi all!

I believe that it is the criticize on my recent predictions involve less success and more misses.
It is like in an earthquake hit area asking why 10% building were felt down though there were 90%
buildings were cracked / intact. It is injustice to do premature evaluation for a new born baby in
the initial days itself before knowing whether he or she and know about his/her skills.

I have told already that my predictions are not yielding cent percent results and what I want to
highlight is the sun shadow method is yielding successful results comparing to results involved
with huge costs and equipments. The other advantage is it is working in a remote area without
any support. The only need is fine tuning the method for getting still better results with
systematic approach.

From my point of view it is not correct doing evaluation in the following manner, viz.

F............N.............F............N.............
...Q.......Q........Q........Q.......Q..............Q
.F............N.............F............N.............
.Q...........Q...........Q..........Q.........Q.......
F............N.............F............N.............
...Q........Q........Q.........Q...........Q........Q.
F............N.............F............N.............
....Q.......Q......Q......Q......Q........Q...........

But it as to do patiently like:

E
A
R
T
H

Q
U
A
K
E

P
R
E
D
I
C
T
I
O
N

I
S

P
O
S
S
I
B
L
E
.

Shan