Pseudo prediction
Posted by Alan Jones on October 20, 2000 at 06:16:28:

You have probably noticed that a lot of earthquake predictors state their percentage of correct predictions. I understand Jim Berkland claims 80%. As I've often stated, one cannot evaluate a predictor in this way. What if his/her prediction is for an event, such as a very small earthquake, that is almost guarenteed to happen?

To illustrate this, I am making a "prediction" for each 7-day period starting today for California and part of Nevada. The latitude and longitude limits are: 32.5N to 42.1N and 112.5W to 126W. I am "predicting" that there will be at least one event of magnitude 3.3 from 2000/10/20 0:00:00 UTC until 2000/10/27 0:00:00 UTC. By looking at similar windows since 1960, I believe I will have at least one hit about 92% of the time.

Let's let nature do its thing and see what happens. I will try to report the results here each Friday.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Pseudo pred Hit! 3.6 nr. Baker... - martin@n.i.c.e.  10:38:51 - 10/22/2000  (3845)  (1)
        ● Re: Pseudo pred Hit! 3.5 nr Mendocino  - martin@n.i.c.e.  14:48:27 - 10/26/2000  (3864)  (0)
     ● Re: Pseudo prediction - Don in Hollister  10:54:26 - 10/20/2000  (3840)  (0)
     ● Re: prediction windows - martin@n.i.c.e.  10:47:48 - 10/20/2000  (3839)  (0)
     ● Re: Pseudo prediction - Bob Shannon  07:57:37 - 10/20/2000  (3838)  (0)