|
Re: WØW! |
Canie's was cool....good it was remote. The science behind the link below is sound but it is real easy to mis-interpret and overstate what they are trying to say....(removing a vertical load does make a thrust fault more likely to slip sooner....and a normal fault less likely...removing some volume of Alaskan ice would only slightly advance the time of a thrust EQ. SW Alaska is not a subduction boundary until you get towards Anchorage and west...so I'm not sure what melting ice would do to strike-slip faults.. Follow Ups: ● Re: WØW! - marc / berkeley 15:30:42 - 6/9/2006 (38121) (1) ● Re: WØW! - Cathryn 16:23:11 - 6/9/2006 (38122) (1) ● Re: WØW! - chris in suburbia 23:08:04 - 6/9/2006 (38134) (1) ● Norway meteorite has no web presence - chris in suburbia 23:54:13 - 6/9/2006 (38135) (1) ● Re: Norway meteorite has no web presence - Canie 14:27:18 - 6/10/2006 (38157) (1) ● Re: Norway meteorite UPDATE - Canie 16:57:25 - 6/15/2006 (38335) (0) |
|