Re: 6+M at KYUSHU, JAPAN ?
Posted by Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande on June 02, 2006 at 15:56:35:

Hi Shan. Your methodology appears, to me, to be highly unlikely to work. In particular, the theory behind it seems to be contradicted by much of what is known to a high degree of certainty about cosmology, orbital dynamics, earth science and more. And I do not believe your simple apparatus could be detecting variations in the angle of Earth's spin axis which elude the much more sophisticated instruments used by others. Do you claim that you are detecting daily variations that others do not detect? Leaving aside, for now, the fact that such extraordinarily tiny variations are highly unlikely to either trigger quakes, or to provide locational, magnitude or timing clues for impending quakes, I do see that you have made some succesful predictions. But I do not have the time, or skill, to subject your predictions to the rigorous analysis that would be necessary to determine if you are onto something.

I, and others, will remain skeptical until you can provide that analysis, from a qualified source.

Good luck to you on your endeavors, and my compliments on your website; it is fairly easy to read, navigate and comprehend.

Michael Williams in Arroyo Grande, CA USA
"Quantify it before it disappears." Stephen Jay Gould


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: 6+M at KYUSHU, JAPAN ? - R.Shanmugasundaram  03:37:10 - 6/3/2006  (37755)  (0)
     ● Mike, I've already done that. - Roger Hunter  16:36:02 - 6/2/2006  (37749)  (1)
        ● Thanks Roger-Hadn't Been Paying Attention (N/T) - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  21:37:09 - 6/2/2006  (37751)  (0)