Petra,

The only connection between Robertson and Berkland is "they are both controversial". Beyond that the comparison ends. Roberts is using an unproven metaphysical basis. Berkland uses known, scientifically measurable conditions to make his predictions. Here's the difference; I can check out Berklands' data and results. As for Robertson; nobody can scientifically check his data. You don't see Roger checking out Robertson on a continuing basis, because there is really NOTHING there. Mixing metaphysics and science is a bad idea.

Glen