Come on now, let's think positive about this. It is interesting and I got another thought recently. It would be good to start at ground zero and let Kathy tell Dr. Jones herself, everytime she has a headache and then no one has to look behind, but see what is there today.

What I am interested in seeing in particular is whether she gets headaches more often for certain faults than other ones. Does the magnitude of the quake that arrives depend on which fault it arrives on. Recently she said she had a very severe headache and then it ended in 12 hours. So does that have an difference from a quake that is of less intensity, but lasts longer? So if you're catching my drift, the analysis can be taken in several avenues of research. Also, have there been changes over the years? And if so, in what ways? Therefore in the research to understand Kathy Gori's headaches, its far more vast and complex than, "did the earthquake arrive?" If one were to prepare a map like the USGS maps and place the earthquakes under computer generation, and watch as they roll out, day after day and year in and year out, what do we actually see?

If Alan Jones is not interested, I have someone else in mind, who does take these matters seriously, has an open mind and is a serious researcher for the truth. Update asap.

Petra