Re: EQ prediction debate
Posted by Roger Musson on July 05, 2000 at 03:06:30:

I do feel obliged to point out that this is very much an American take on the subject. Earthquake prediction is not a taboo subject in either Europe and Asia; there are extensive and well-funded research programmes. The European Seismological Commission has a whole subcommission devoted to earthquake prediction. China has an enormous state-funded programme. The idea that earthquake prediction scientists are persecuted and neglected just ain't true - not outside the USA, anyway.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQ prediction debate - Dennis Gentry in Santa Clarita  10:18:38 - 7/5/2000  (3217)  (2)
        ● Re: EQ prediction debate - Roger Musson  08:19:03 - 7/6/2000  (3224)  (2)
           ● I liked that part about - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  09:19:59 - 7/6/2000  (3227)  (0)
           ● Re: EQ prediction debate - Roger  08:21:06 - 7/6/2000  (3225)  (1)
              ● Cool logo; Any reason for the design? (NT) - Dennis Gentry of Santa Clarita  09:22:11 - 7/6/2000  (3228)  (1)
                 ● Re: Cool logo; Any reason for the design? (NT) - Roger  02:56:28 - 7/7/2000  (3232)  (0)
        ● Re: EQ prediction debate/ ? For Roger - Petra Challus  12:57:54 - 7/5/2000  (3218)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ prediction debate/ ? For Roger - Roger Musson  08:12:29 - 7/6/2000  (3222)  (0)