So, then is one of Lowell Whiteside's Methods Endorsed by Roger Hunter?
Posted by Ara on November 24, 2005 at 06:42:56:

Don: "What you [Ara] posted about and what I'm using are two differnt things."

John: "my impression...Lowell was using several methods combined in geoforecasters, but this is guesswork as they never would say what they were doing as long as I was paying attention."

And they're still not saying, I guess.

Don, it really does not help to say that you are using Lowell Whiteside Version 3.8 and not Version 2.5 when no one knows what they are anyway. Fact is, it has been stated on this board that you are using a "proprietary" method that belongs to Lowell Whiteside. You have never suggested otherwise. I really don't care what version it is, or when Lowell Whiteside was using it.

My question to Roger still stands: is he endorsing this particular version of Lowell Whiteside that Don is using, or does his positive evaluation mean nothing in particular?

Meanwhile, if Shan is reading this, he can take a very big hint from the forthright, straightforward, frank and fair Americans: when they ask prying questions, just tell them your Super-Secret Sun-Shadow Calculation Method is PROPRIETARY. End of Discussion lol