|
Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion |
Ara; Roger: "I have explained the Monte Carlo method more than once already." That's right, I have. Check the archives. > Goodnes, Roger, you are starting to sound like Shan. How ironic. But you forgot to add "to the extent possible" like Shan does. Live and learn! And you are starting to sound like Ara. Nothing to offer but full of criticism. > Even John didn't quite get what you were talking about with Monte Carlo. john can speak for himself. > For your sake, I sure hope it allows you to evaluate predictions that have varying probabilities, unlike your old Jonesian Model. Otherwise, you had better find a new hobby fast. Yes, it does. Roger
Follow Ups: ● Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion - Ara 07:09:18 - 11/20/2005 (30763) (1) ● Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion - Roger Hunter 09:27:33 - 11/20/2005 (30787) (1) ● Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara 20:43:43 - 11/20/2005 (30822) (1) ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Roger Hunter 20:49:51 - 11/20/2005 (30823) (1) ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara 07:32:31 - 11/21/2005 (30840) (0) |
|