Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion
Posted by Roger Hunter on November 19, 2005 at 06:10:36:

Ara;

Roger: "I have explained the Monte Carlo method more than once already."

That's right, I have. Check the archives.

> Goodnes, Roger, you are starting to sound like Shan. How ironic. But you forgot to add "to the extent possible" like Shan does. Live and learn!

And you are starting to sound like Ara. Nothing to offer but full of criticism.

> Even John didn't quite get what you were talking about with Monte Carlo.

john can speak for himself.

> For your sake, I sure hope it allows you to evaluate predictions that have varying probabilities, unlike your old Jonesian Model. Otherwise, you had better find a new hobby fast.

Yes, it does.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion  - Ara  07:09:18 - 11/20/2005  (30763)  (1)
        ● Re: Glen's Revised Subdued Opinion  - Roger Hunter  09:27:33 - 11/20/2005  (30787)  (1)
           ● Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara  20:43:43 - 11/20/2005  (30822)  (1)
              ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Roger Hunter  20:49:51 - 11/20/2005  (30823)  (1)
                 ● Re: Dr Alan Jones hits the Monte Carlo jackpot - Ara  07:32:31 - 11/21/2005  (30840)  (0)