Antonio,

I understand what you are saying, but...

Nobody is going to go out and read through all of your previous posts to see what you may or may not mean with each new prediction. Each prediction in itself has to be clear as to what you are actually predicting.

In the case of the Greece/Turkey prediction you posted:
----------------------------------------------
Prediction #38, Signals Received on May/25/00
Location : ? (Greece est- Turky) ?
Magnitude : 3.8 (Mw)
Window : Jun 20 - 30
% of Chance : 50%
-----------------------------------------------

And then in this follow-up post you say that:

3.5 becomes a 4.0 to about 500km distant me
1500km as Naples, the 3.8 means 5.0/5.5 at least.

So the above prediction could have been written as:

----------------------------------------------
Prediction #38, Signals Received on May/25/00
Location : ? (Greece est- Turky) ?
Magnitude in Greece or Turkey vs distance from my location:
0km to less then 500km 3.8 (Mw)
500km to less then 1500km 4.3(Mw)
1500km to less then 3000km 5.0(Mw) to 5.5(Mw)
My Location: 43N/110E
Window : Jun 20 - 30
% of Chance : 50%
-----------------------------------------------

In the above example you'd need to figure out in km the furthest part of Turkey from your location and the coordinates for your location.

To Dr.G.Chouliaras, isn't the above a little more constructive then the one you posted?

Dennis