Re: EQ Prediction Registry
Posted by Roger Hunter on November 08, 2005 at 22:02:46:

Machael;

No, you're right. The methods are standard but the database will be argued.

One thing the registry should have is a timestamp to prevent postdictions and aftershock predictions.

The registry must be an unimpeachable record of what was predicted and when.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  00:42:20 - 11/9/2005  (30212)  (1)
        ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Roger Hunter  06:40:50 - 11/9/2005  (30217)  (1)
           ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  10:46:49 - 11/9/2005  (30219)  (0)
     ● Re: EQ Prediction Registry - Michael Tolchard  00:28:33 - 11/9/2005  (30210)  (0)