Shan,

"So unable to tolerate this and to make confuse among the members of the board Ara made his statement so quickly and issued a wrong statement."

No, my statement is correct. Your Japan location stated on this board Oct 18 differs from the location presented on your website Oct 18.

"The members of the board knew now his intention is very clear."

My intention was to point out a discrepancy in that specific prediction because it concerned Japan, where I live. Also, I have accurately mentioned that you have no intention to disclose your method.

The 37N 138E area you mentioned in your post is Niigata Prefecture, an active area that has had 9 felt quakes in the past month. But your website had a location in Kyushu, as the following copy shows.

Shan's website:
"UPDATED 18th October 2005 - 07.30 UTC
PREDICTION Dt.17th & 18th Oct.'05:
Bright sunshine days
Around 6 to 7M quake over

XIZANG (31.1N 81.1E) - NEAR W. CST EASTERN HONSHU (37.2N 138.6E)
LUZON, PHILIPPINE (13.8N 123.1E)
IRIAN JAYA REGION, INDONESIA(3.7S 131.1E) - NORTHERN MOLUCCA SEA (1.0N 126.0E)
MINDANAO, PHILIPPINE ISLAND (5.7N 125.7E) - TAIWAN REGION (24.1N 122.6E)
MARIANA ISLANDS (17.4N 145.9E) - VANUATU (13.8S 167.4E)
KOMANDORSKIYE OSTROVA REGION (55.55N 165.67E)

and round 5 to 6M quake over

NORTHERN SUMATERA (5.7N 94.9E) - NEW BRITAIN (5.8S 148.8E)
KYUSHU, JAPAN (33.6N 130.3E) - XIZANG (31.1N 88.8E)
SOUTH OF KERMADEC ISLANDS (34.5S 179.6E) - ANDREANOF ISLANDS (51.55N 175.97W)

may occur within next 48 to 240 hours from 04.30 UTC on 17th Oct. 2005."

Please notice that the Japanese location in Shan's post was
NEAR W. CST EASTERN HONSHU (37.2N 138.6E)
but on the website it was
KYUSHU, JAPAN (33.6N 130.3E)

The quake yesterday was in Tokyo:

6.4 2005/10/19 11:44:44 36.397 140.851 37.2 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

It is far from both Niigata and Kyushuu, the two locations mentioned in your prediction. If you want to predict something in Kyushuu or Niigata and claim a result in Tokyo, Japanese people will laugh at you. That much is only my opinion.

However, the discrepancy between your post and your website is a fact.
Your explicit refusal to disclose your method on this board is also a fact.

"refuse to comment on his post in this Board further."

If you want to refuse to answer valid questions, that is your choice, just as it is your choice not to reveal your method.

"issued a wrong statement."

You are the one who has issued a wrong statement about me.