|
|
|
Re: What does Dennis Gentry have to say??
|
Posted by Pat In Petaluma on April 14, 2000 at 00:35:06:
Hi Tony & Char, Earthquake sensitives are indeed sensitive people in the feelings department. They need to have a place that is open to them without restraints on what they say, as it is an outlet to expressing a lot of inner feelings about a wide range of topics. When together, they seem to bounce off of each other and the networking works. But for most, one their own, the record isn't very good. It has to be a team effort. Though I've never met Charlotte King, I do know of her past work and one thing that struck me immeditely was that she reminds me much of people who are psychic. In the beginning they do well and as they start to charge more and more money for their services, their accuracy changes. Gordon Michael Scallion is another in this same regard. Just from my own personal opinion I believe God gave people these gifts to share with everyone and not only for those who can afford the higher rates. Gifts of any nature are meant to be shared, not charged excessively. If one wants to make certain the maximum number of people are warned then, you can't put a price on saving the life of people. While I do at times charge for my services, I am very reasonble in doing so. If someone asks me for help and I know they can't afford it, I do it for free, but if charged its very moderate compared to others. The most important thing is to bring comfort to those in need. As most who know Dennis know he has been working very hard of late and hasn't had the time to post anywhere. But if someone wants to know what he's getting from his instruments, and express concern, I think he would answer an e-mail and let anyone know if he's picking something up. He has a very good record for the most part and his contributions are always welcome, anywhere. I agree that something is coming somewhere. I have a few ideas about those places, but until I can find the scientific data to support a large event, its not going to be good enough to deliver to the public. It takes both to make sure a prediction is going to stand and be worthy delivery without unnecessary alarm. Sometimes we stand on a thin line in this regard and I keep trying to remind myself that before I scare the you know what out of someone, I want to be a little more certain and put it in a light that though it appears possible, it may not happen. So let us continue to seek out every precursor to an event and see if it really is serious before we give it and possibly create panic and chaos and find the event never happens. I'd hate to think someone got worried about something I said to the degree they might alter their course in life for a period of time and found it a waste of time, then the next time, they wouldn't listen at all. So in that, discernment is required. Just my two cents....Pat
|
|
|