Egregio doct. Chouliares,
in this period I am doing such a work for trying to understandig the arguments of the eichone writes about EQs. For all that I am able to understand, I find everything of great interest and I am sorry I can't compete with their speed.
Then, being I able to give few answers, my interest goes to your regards being our places have geographic ties and greater historical ties,
Partenope does not forget Magna Grecia.

Now, listen me, when a my child did his first drawning, a little bad in true, I told him with great enthusiasm: Wonderful! The drawning was bad, but it was. If I had said mmmmmh! probabily
he should have let the pencil, aginst today my son in design is good as I am.
Yuo'll understand what I mean.

I would prefer you had say me:
stupid dirty-canvas, do you not realize that for three times you forecasted an EQ of 4.5 or 5.0 and, against, there was been for the three times three great explosion of the Etna?
Because after feb/6,Feb/27 and mar/20 in which
I signed "H" there was been a strong answer of Etna and only today i'm realizing about it.

Why did you not say anything about the last EQ in Rome with replies good forecasted by me?
This first period of 2.000 has been calm, I know already that will not be next time,nothing of greatly particular, but there will be a great number of shocks about 3.0 3.5 (only in mar/21 I counted about 30 of its)and ever EQ more long than the last ones or maybe more distant, also the zones will change or maybe the deeps.
For my experiences of twenty years I know many things but it needs anyone help me to put in order, I filter much notices from the earth but its go on the wind.
How you say, best regards,Antonio.