Posted by Antonio Romino on February 14, 2000 at 13:44:25:
Please, take care to save the following explanation also for next times: N>/YYYYMMDD/ZONE'CODE/T.PERC.// ----------------//PLACE LAT.LON/MAG/DATE/%/NOTE The first part, before //, goes with the perceptions in my body.Read: N> = Numerical progression of notable EQs perceived in a year. YYYYMMDD = Date of perception. ZONE'S CODE = The side of my body receiving the perception. T.PERC. = Duration of the perception (Mw=moment, 5MM=5minutes, 10MM=10minutes, etc.). The second part, after //, goes with the corresponded EQs that will occur. Read: PLACE or LAT-LON = Geographic zone or LAT. and LON. were the predict EQ will occur. MAG = Magnitude in Richter (with an oscillation about -0.2,+0.2. DATE = From day "X" to day "Y" in which the EQ will occur. % = Percentage of chance. NOTE = Possible notes (a,b,c,...) adding. Beying in experimental phase the attribution of exact LAT and LON and the exact data, I'll be most grateful to anyone will be able to lend a hand to me to identifying its. Any EQs are easly identifying, because its are formed about two or more shockes, how to say its have a "signature".
Sometime it happens that, a group of shockes in a swarm comes out together, giving a longer EQ with more MAG. Example: Two shockes of 4.0 together could have give an EQ getting up 4.5 about. When "to-identifying", the sign MAG will intend near Naples. -----------PREDICTION FROM 01/01/2000------------- 01>/20000101/RDB25,LDB21/Mw//--------------------- --//to identifying/3.0/from...to.../50%/ 02>/20000103/RSA2/Mw//---------------------------- --//Sannio or Umbria/3.0/from...to.../50%/ 03>/20000103/RSA8/Mw//---------------------------- --//Umbria/3.5/from...to.../50%/ 04>/20000110/RDC12/Mw//--------------------------- --//to identifying/3.5/from feb08 to feb13/50%/--- --/note(a): to zone RDC in general corrispond : in Italy (Lazio,Toscana,Emilia), in the world a line going from Greece (Giannina-Cefalonia), to Iran, to Tokio since to Los Angeles. 05>/20000115/RSC14/Mw//--------------------------- --//Friuli-Sicilia/4.0/from feb13 to feb18/50% 06>/20000123/RSC4/Mw//---------------------------- --//Potentino/3.5/from feb21 to feb28/50% 07>/20000130/RSA8/Mw/Mw//------------------------- --//Umbria/3.5 and 4.0/from mar01 to mar06/50%/--- --/note(b): two shockes in the same zone. 08>/20000203/RSA23,RSC3/3MM//--------------------- --//to identifying/4.0/from mar03 to mar08/50%/--- --/note(c): 18 shockes of 2.5 together 09>/20000204/RSA2/1MM//--------------------------- --//Sannio or Umbria/3.5/from mar05 to mar10/50% 10>/20000206/RSA1/10MM//-------------------------- --//Sannio or Umbria/3.5 4.0 3.5 and any others on 3.0/from mar05 to mar10/50%/note(d): if the shockes will occur together it could have been about 5.0. 11>/20000211/RDC1/Mw/Mw//------------------------- --//Toscana-Emilia/3.5 and 4.0/from mar12 to mar17/50%/note(a/b) 12>/20000212/RSA8/Mw//---------------------------- --//Umbria/some little shockes(4) on 2.5/from mar13 to mar18/50% :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Together the above predictions I send also the following signals appartening to EQs (some already occurred, for archive) will occur in short time (three days about) in and around Italy: feb03-----"g"--"g" feb05-----swarm of "g" feb06-----"H"* feb07-----"H"*--"H"**--"H"**--"H"* feb08-----"H"*--"H"* feb09-----"C+>"**(720MM) feb10-----"c->"(power 0.5) feb11-----"H"*--"c->"(power 1.0)--"g"--"g" feb12-----"c"(power 2.0) feb13-----"c"(power 1.0)--"b->"--"n"x4--"H"* feb14-----"n"--"m"--"c"(power 2.0) I'll send as soon as possible the parametres and explanation.
|