Re: incomplete prediction on location
Posted by Petra on March 29, 2005 at 19:35:08:

Chris,

I tried to put in a radius of 300 miles because these areas are really hard to match, but without putting longitude and latitude in the machine won't take a radius. You may not appreciate this, but the degree of difficulty on this one is extreme. They don't have earthquakes down there every day you know, so if Mexico Rocks in that general vicinity, you better consider it a hit. Or I'll put it this way, I don't care if you consider it a hit, I will.

I'm going to say this again because some people are not understanding the point of the experiment is to match tones to locations. The rest is window dressing. So the experiment will continue despite any negative notes because I want it to, not for you, but for me. It's my thing.

Oh, and a curious aside, I'm working on a patent for my "earthquake prediction by sound" technique as Intellectual Property. That way if one day someone wakes up and smells the coffee, I'll be there before they can claim the instrument was their idea. I don't have the right to write a paper about it, but the paper I'll have could be money in the bank somewhere down the line and the ear tone group will share in the proceeds.

They say the Holy Grail was a Chalice....ummm interesting.

Petra