John,
gI doubt you're still listening, but here is what bothered me about your messagescHowever, your posts before that had a more level-headed toneh

Sure, I am listening. In each case of your excerpts, I am responding to something that you wrote. At first, just on the basis of one initial comment
"Publicizing [in the Public Information Offices article] such speculation with qualifications, but without any clarity, seems to serve no other purpose than PR."

you accused me of insulting you. Afterwards, you did not answer any of the main points I made, and called my criticism a gdiatribeh, saying that I was gblissfully unawareh etc.

It would have been easy to ignore any perceived tone, and just answer the points I was raising. I think what bothers you the most is having your work and ideas criticized at all. And your understanding of such words as gtheoryh and ginsulth are quite different from mine.

Ara