Roger...your wording is a bit ambiguous so I can't quite follow your post. In particular, I can't follow: "All but one of them were veryy low probability and since that one was a hit she has only 2 really good hits out of 7 predictions."
Also, what is a "hit"?

Petra, if you don't post publicly then it will not be interesting to me...I won't want to hear your claims of success or Roger's evaluations of predictions that I did not see. And, although perhaps unlikely that I would be of any use anyway, I'm certainly not going to approach, for example, the UCSB physicists working on earthquakes based on a private prediction record.

Chris