Actually I dont want to post my previous message but I want to post it because expecting
such comments to give a chance to explain my mistakes in sun shadow method. But remember
so far I have been successful in number of times as you knew and waiting to improve the
tolerence level of +/- 3 degrees in finding the location.

As I have stated many times in the board, without similar observatories I am unable to pin
point the location very accurately. In the said instance I have given the location in a
diffused sunlight day and that too after such consequtive days means that unable to follow
the earthmovement continuously with loss of supporting precursors registered at various timings.
Without 3 good consequtive days sun shadow readings, fixing the magnitude, location and time
frame is not possible. In this particular case, shift factor i.e. the distance between the normal
path and the deviated path is so high and also sun shines a couple of seconds together is a rare
event which indicates for a incoming very strong quake. So I am curious to post the same in my
websites this event with the expectation of CA quake on the other side of the earth. Though I
have noticed some moderate quake activities over EAST COAST OF HONSHU on 2nd Sept. and posted
in my websites the day itself, subsequently it was not followed due to lack of sunshine.

Please note that my predicted time frame and 6+M magnitude and the direction I expected from my
observatory were correct and I agreed I missed the location since its need basic data to be derived
from good sunshine days. But I don't know the reason for the expected long term prediction of CA
quake by experts based on PROBABILITY CALCULATIONS which does not fullfil even one among the three
basic parameters.

I have more idea but no time to feed my older data into my computer and analysing the same in
different angle. Perhaps my retirement age may fulfill my ambition to pinpoint the location.

As Don repeatedly highlighting that "we learn more from our mistakes than from our successes", I am
quite happy with this mistake.

But the group which does not believe this method has to pay highly for that in the near future.

Shan