Response to Cathryn
Posted by EQF on August 14, 2004 at 00:07:42:

Since you addressed your note to me I will say the following:

First, the laws of science are not determined by popularity contests.

Second, my posts stick with the main subject matter of this bulletin board. And about the only time that I will tell another board member that I don’t like what they are saying is when they have made a response to one of my notes.

Third, I totally agree with you for the following reason and others that if you and other people who do not like the technology I am discussing in these posts then you should ignore them and never respond to them.

There are quite a few people who do like the information I am discussing. And they might post response notes and discuss the subject matter themselves except that they are afraid to do that because of all of the attack notes which are being posted here. Some time ago Canie and I had one of the world’s top scientists in this area set to begin posting notes here. He had gotten approval and a password and everything. But he saw one of these heated exchanges and decided not to join the group I believe for fear of having his professional career damaged.

I doubt that any people like that will ever consider posting to the board again because of all of the attack notes. Scientists and other researchers do not like them.

So, please stop posting notes in response to mine. And stop commenting on my notes in other notes that you post here. And things should go along much more smoothly.

Finally, please use EQF if you decide to say something about one of my notes. The use of that penname helps keep heated discussions in this board from spilling over into other areas.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Response to EQF - Cathryn  01:59:28 - 8/14/2004  (22485)  (1)
        ● Note to Canie and Cathryn - EQF  02:11:55 - 8/14/2004  (22486)  (1)
           ● Re: Note to Canie and Cathryn - Cathryn  02:55:05 - 8/14/2004  (22489)  (0)