Hi Roger,

I am a bit more organized that you might think. One of the main problems is the fact that this particular technology is so complex and so different from what people are used to dealing with that they don’t know how to evaluate the data or the theories behind the technology. And in certain ways it is I believe perhaps a quarter of a century more advanced than what other people are working with.

At the moment I am running a lengthy series of tests on my warning signal data collected prior to December 26, 2003 to see how well my Earthquake and Tornado Data Evaluation Program would have done with detecting the approach of those deadly December earthquakes in Bam, Iran and California if the program had existed at the time. Each computer run takes 30 minutes to an hour. And I have to do at least a dozen of them for the analysis.

So far the results look encouraging. And if things turn out the way that I am expecting then I am planning to let governments and disaster mitigation groups around the world etc. know that the program works for certain. If time permits I will then also probably reformat my Data.html Web page so that it displays the data with a more understandable format. The present format was the best that I could do at this time.

Those plots you mentioned are actually quite different. He has no California earthquakes on his plot. And I have very few on the west coast of South America. They are intended for research purposes rather than earthquake warnings.