|
Web page data |
Hi Roger, This technology has matured to the point where I am not even bothering to argue about it with people in the Newsgroups etc. anymore. I have a high level of confidence in it. And I know how to improve it. The main problem now is finding time to discuss it with people and to do further development work etc. Each year I detect something like 500 0.25 to 20 second duration signals such as Ear Tones which I believe are electromagnetic energy field fluctuations which are linked with events taking place in earthquake fault zones around the world and probably to some extent with solar and geomagnetic storms. Among other things the large table on that Web page shows the quality of the match between signals which were detected during the past 3 months with 90 past earthquakes. 45 were probably harmless. And 45 were destructive. The calculations were done by my new Earthquake And Tornado Data Evaluation computer program. The program looks at more than 20,000 past earthquakes. And it presently takes about a half hour of computer time to generate that table. The PR: numbers on the left side of the table are for all of the determinations for a single earthquake averaged together. The numbers in the center and on the left side of the table show how well individual signals matched a given earthquake. You can see that the program determined that a few of the signals detected last June 18 were probably pointing to that destructive July 1 Turkey earthquake. Follow Ups: ● Re: Web page data - Roger Hunter 07:24:22 - 7/4/2004 (21872) (1) ● Re: Web page data - EQF 13:14:33 - 7/4/2004 (21873) (0) |
|