Hi Gents,

If a moderate or large earthquake has no aftershocks does it have any more meaning than one's that do? Though the Santa Barbara Channel quake had a foreshock, then a main shock, but no aftershocks could the mainshock possibly be a foreshock to a larger quake?

Do you think it is interesting that we had the SBC quake followed by the Point Lopez quake?

I hope it means something and that by the time I arrive in either Paso Robles or Parkfield the Earth is gonna give up something memorable while I'm there. I'm darn tired of that quakeless feeling.

Petra