Re: very helpful, thanks
Posted by Cathryn on March 22, 2004 at 15:46:40:

I'm glad you all found it as elucidating as I did. Really debunks the tidal earthquake theory in language that even the layperson can understand. Since we all know the gravitational effects of the lunar cycle is not enough to cause earthquakes, as once postulated, it's nice to have another theory to bat around.

Happy reading.

Cathryn

Follow Ups:
     ● What ARE you people talking about? - Roger Hunter  16:24:06 - 3/22/2004  (21394)  (3)
        ● Re: What ARE you people talking about? - Cathryn  21:33:16 - 3/24/2004  (21422)  (1)
           ● I HAVE Flash. No snails - Roger Hunter  07:25:43 - 3/25/2004  (21427)  (1)
              ● Re: I HAVE Flash. No snails - Cathryn  08:42:20 - 3/25/2004  (21428)  (0)
        ● Earthquakes? - chris in suburbia  04:30:43 - 3/23/2004  (21401)  (1)
           ● Re: Earthquakes? - Cathryn  14:51:54 - 3/23/2004  (21408)  (1)
              ● Re: Earthquakes? - Cathryn  14:53:13 - 3/23/2004  (21409)  (1)
                 ● Re: Earthquakes? - Don in Hollister  20:03:18 - 3/23/2004  (21416)  (1)
                    ● Re: Earthquakes? - Cathryn  21:22:01 - 3/24/2004  (21421)  (0)
        ● Re: What ARE you people talking about? - Don in Hollister  17:27:09 - 3/22/2004  (21395)  (1)
           ● Re: What ARE you people talking about? - Roger Hunter  20:21:13 - 3/22/2004  (21396)  (1)
              ● Test Run - Petra  20:44:31 - 3/22/2004  (21398)  (1)
                 ● Re: Test Run - Mary C.  07:18:53 - 3/23/2004  (21405)  (1)
                    ● Re: Test Run - Roger Hunter  07:43:12 - 3/23/2004  (21406)  (1)
                       ● Re: Test Run - Cathryn  14:57:37 - 3/23/2004  (21410)  (0)