Hi All. The M>3.1 quake near Ludlow could be the quake I was looking for. However it isn’t close enough in location or time to be of any use for anything other then to tell me that my math is accurate, but not accurate enough.

However there is the old problem of not knowing if it’s going to be a major quake, or just a popcorn one. I suppose one could look to see how the data lines up with an area in which a major quake has a higher probability of occurring. That means the accuracy has to be much better then what I’m able to achieve. Take Care…Don in creepy town