|
you've published something? |
I've seen no statistics evaluating any of your claims on any of your pages, so you're clearly not an expert in assessing correlations. You're still not mentioning any of your shadow collaborators. See the link for the publications of one of the scientists in IGPP, the institute I am that I'm currently directing (although I haven't yet updated the web page), and compare it with your publications. He and three or four other faculty and 25 Ph.D. researchers and graduate students at UCLA specialize in measuring the magnetic and electric fields in space and on the ground. I've talked with Chris about this topic, and he thinks the idea that EM fields influence earthquakes is laughable. He's written over 1000 papers on these topics. Type my name and earthquakes into Google to see some of my work. I've seen your CV, and find it remarkable that you've chosen to lecture us on earthquakes and EM fields. John Follow Ups: ● different Chris - chris in suburbia 20:15:07 - 12/31/2003 (20786) (3) ● Re: different Chris - Canie 11:58:46 - 1/3/2004 (20857) (1) ● Canie, sorry about my tone above - John Vidale 12:28:01 - 1/3/2004 (20858) (0) ● No correlation is what I meant. - Roger Hunter 21:23:24 - 12/31/2003 (20791) (0) ● Right, I meant Chris Russell - John Vidale 20:34:00 - 12/31/2003 (20788) (1) ● Re: Right, I meant Chris Russell - Don in Hollister 20:36:31 - 12/31/2003 (20789) (0) |
|