where's the evidence?
Posted by John Vidale on October 27, 2003 at 06:15:41:

Robert,

Sounds exotic. What do you predict better than the traditional explanations?

John

C - very good book, I'm just up to page 30 so far, mostly carved pumpkins this weekend.

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: where's the evidence? - Cathryn  16:33:15 - 10/28/2003  (19898)  (0)
     ● Re: the evidence is >5% correct predictions? - Robert Rhodes  22:34:01 - 10/27/2003  (19883)  (2)
        ● concise evidence of >5% correctness? - John Vidale  17:21:21 - 10/28/2003  (19899)  (1)
           ● How about ~10% correct for quakes last week? - Robert Rhodes  18:12:15 - 10/28/2003  (19900)  (1)
              ● Re: How about ~10% correct for quakes last week? - Don in Hollister  18:52:35 - 10/28/2003  (19901)  (1)
                 ● You did not confirm or deny my successful earthquake predictions - Robert Rhodes  12:28:33 - 10/29/2003  (19910)  (2)
                    ● enough said - John Vidale  20:40:09 - 10/29/2003  (19916)  (0)
                    ● Re: You did not confirm or deny my successful earthquake predictions - Don in Hollister  14:03:49 - 10/29/2003  (19911)  (0)
        ● Re: the evidence is >5% correct predictions? - Don in Hollister  23:24:38 - 10/27/2003  (19884)  (0)