Re: true but may not be helpful
Posted by Canie on June 25, 2003 at 07:59:59:

I would think that using the San Juan Bautista area for anything would be picking a very unusual area to base anything on as it is under constant slip. I don't think there is any other area along the SAF that exhibits this same behavior, so I don't think it would be meaningful to apply anything learned in that area to anything else.

And Don suggested between Portola Valley and the SF Penninsula was a possibility for the next quake - Is there a map somewhere on the net showing the rupture from the 4 quakes Don mentioned? Is this working on the Gap theory or is it because the 4 quakes mentioned all seem to be in Santa Cruz county?

Canie


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: true but may not be helpful - Don in Hollister  15:53:31 - 6/25/2003  (18982)  (1)
        ● Found Laurel - Don in Hollister  17:05:23 - 6/25/2003  (18983)  (0)