Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com
Posted by Petra Challus on May 22, 2003 at 07:13:51:

Hi Canie,

That's exactly what I said last night. I'm not going to waste my time trying to make sense out of what I believe is total nonsense. Nor am I going to make anymore predictions here. If thirty or so threads can be developed on telling someone they are wrong and only two on something that is totally correct, then we have to give the viewing audience what they wish to see the most and it appears to be controvery.

I didn't say I was leaving, I just said I'll let EQF continue to work on whatever it is he says he is working on and just leave him be.

There are many others topics of interest to cover and I'll just stick to what I think is important. Its obvious no one believes you can predict earthquakes with ear tones, so why even bother. Being correct is one thing, but the method being correct also seems to be a problem. I've got four years into the development of my program and for the most part it works, its simple and I am as honest as I can be when I make a prediction.

There is no room here for correctness or honesty in regard to predictions, so I'll just keep my stuff to myself and give it to someone who I know has somewhat of an interest.

Have a Terrific Thursday....Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Okay EQF, You Have The Com - Canie  22:52:23 - 5/22/2003  (18775)  (0)
     ● logical next step - John Vidale  08:51:18 - 5/22/2003  (18766)  (1)
        ● Re: logical next step - Um Logic? - Petra Challus  18:36:49 - 5/22/2003  (18772)  (1)
           ● that was a good call! - John Vidale  21:33:01 - 5/22/2003  (18774)  (0)