You said the following:

"On April 7, 2003 I circulated advisories for specific locations in 4 countries, none of them here in the U.S. And mildly destructive earthquakes have now occurred in 3 of those 4 countries. One of them was so far from the location that I identified that I am not claiming it as a success. But a recent one in Turkey was moderately close to my stated location. And another in Afghanistan appears to have occurred very close."

1. Where is the unknown location of quake #4?
2. Without posting a prediction in advance with specifics it has zero value.
3. Can you verify to anyone you know, ie: the board moderator for instance that the above statement is true?
4. If we are not going to be given the prediction before the quake occurs, then why should we accept the information after the quake occurs?
5. If its good enough for the foreign countries, then it should be good enough to share with everyone here. So why don't you? Suppose there is someone reading this board who lives in a foreign country and might wish to warn their relatives or friends, do you think they will benefit if you only tell the governments of those countries? You're selling the people short because you know the governments do not act on your warnings because you have no track record and no credentials to prove you are a known predictive scientist attached to any accedited university or organization.

You are as a feather in the wind.

Petra