Theory information question
Posted by EQF on March 10, 2003 at 17:12:16:

John, first I would recommend that you consider using friendlier headings with your posts here. If you use a heading which sounds like criticism then it can make responding to your post more complicated. If you have a negative comment on someone's posts then I feel that it sits better if it is included in the body of the post rather than in its title.

Second, I feel that one of the problems here is that you are engaged in conversations in a number of bulletin boards and probably Newsgroups as well as other locations perhaps. The result appears to be that you are not spending the amount of time needed to understand what is being discussed in my threads. What you do with your time is your business. But I do not believe that it is fair for you to try to talk about my work as an authority on the subject if you are not willing to spend the time needed to learn what I am doing.

I have a theory information question which you might be able to answer:

Do you know of any location where Jim Berkland's earthquake triggering theories are discussed in detail? I have visited his Web site quite a few times over the years. But if there are any pages there which go into detail regarding his theories then I must have somehow missed them.

And, I am still preparing that chart I have been discussing. I presently feel that some of the data in it are both interesting and valuable.


Follow Ups:
     ● various - John Vidale  17:35:26 - 3/10/2003  (18247)  (1)
        ● Re: various - EQF  18:24:31 - 3/10/2003  (18249)  (0)