|
the problem |
EQF Your problem is once again visible. You assume your hunch was advance warning of the event in China. However, to the rest of us, it's clear You seem to assume that an earthquake about to strike a city provides a different signal than earthquakes in the rest of the world, an idea that has no basis in fact. Why didn't the M6.7 last There is value in objectively testing predictions, or even just stating the prediction before the earthquake, which hasn't been done here yet. John Follow Ups: ● Re: the problem - Don in Hollister 15:05:22 - 2/24/2003 (18147) (1) ● definitely lacks credibility - John Vidale 15:34:42 - 2/24/2003 (18148) (1) ● Re: definitely lacks credibility - Roger Hunter 18:30:11 - 2/24/2003 (18154) (0) |
|