Re: The Correct Answer
Posted by Petra Challus on February 22, 2003 at 21:07:19:

Hi Tony,

It's me, the insurance agent who can answer your question correctly.

Earthquake Insurance is always worth it if you live in a seismic risk zone. The reason is simple. Your home is the largest single investment you will make in your life, but if you don't insure it and a moderate earthquake nearby, or a large earthquake at some distance provides heavy damage you have to consider what your alternatives might be.

If you have the coverage, even with a large deductible, that deductible can be borrowed or possibly granted by FEMA. Without the coverage, the largest amount given by FEMA for quake damage has been $100,000. But you have to remember, that is a loan. So could one qualify for a loan that large with a mortage payment? I don't think most people could. If your house is a total loss, you can get the loan and have to start all over again, but only by claiming bankruptcy for your current home. Not a good alternative.

As many people learned after Loma Prieta, life after an earthquake and its financial impact can be far more stressful than the earthquake experience itself.

I have a full page on my web site devoted to this topic and covers all situations of residence.

Petra



Follow Ups:
     ● oops - John Vidale  21:30:40 - 2/22/2003  (18124)  (1)
        ● Re: oops - not really - Petra Challus  21:51:05 - 2/22/2003  (18125)  (2)
           ● two points - John Vidale  07:39:58 - 2/23/2003  (18129)  (1)
              ● Re: two points - Petra Challus  09:34:12 - 2/23/2003  (18131)  (0)
           ● Okay - now the next question - Tony  07:19:19 - 2/23/2003  (18128)  (1)
              ● Re: Okay - now the next question - Mary C.  09:01:32 - 2/23/2003  (18130)  (2)
                 ● Re: Okay - now the next question - Canie  22:29:26 - 2/24/2003  (18156)  (0)
                 ● Thanks - n/t - Tony  07:09:29 - 2/24/2003  (18136)  (0)