|
Re: The Correct Answer |
Hi Tony, It's me, the insurance agent who can answer your question correctly. Earthquake Insurance is always worth it if you live in a seismic risk zone. The reason is simple. Your home is the largest single investment you will make in your life, but if you don't insure it and a moderate earthquake nearby, or a large earthquake at some distance provides heavy damage you have to consider what your alternatives might be. If you have the coverage, even with a large deductible, that deductible can be borrowed or possibly granted by FEMA. Without the coverage, the largest amount given by FEMA for quake damage has been $100,000. But you have to remember, that is a loan. So could one qualify for a loan that large with a mortage payment? I don't think most people could. If your house is a total loss, you can get the loan and have to start all over again, but only by claiming bankruptcy for your current home. Not a good alternative. As many people learned after Loma Prieta, life after an earthquake and its financial impact can be far more stressful than the earthquake experience itself. I have a full page on my web site devoted to this topic and covers all situations of residence. Petra Follow Ups: ● oops - John Vidale 21:30:40 - 2/22/2003 (18124) (1) ● Re: oops - not really - Petra Challus 21:51:05 - 2/22/2003 (18125) (2) ● two points - John Vidale 07:39:58 - 2/23/2003 (18129) (1) ● Re: two points - Petra Challus 09:34:12 - 2/23/2003 (18131) (0) ● Okay - now the next question - Tony 07:19:19 - 2/23/2003 (18128) (1) ● Re: Okay - now the next question - Mary C. 09:01:32 - 2/23/2003 (18130) (2) ● Re: Okay - now the next question - Canie 22:29:26 - 2/24/2003 (18156) (0) ● Thanks - n/t - Tony 07:09:29 - 2/24/2003 (18136) (0) |
|