Precursor, solar, lunar, gravity, and Solid Earth Tide data
Posted by RQF on December 13, 2002 at 23:16:10:

If you check my 131.html Web page you can see the sun and moon gravity data for those earthquakes in Kansas and Papua New Guinea and some precursor signals which were detected around those times.

Seismic Activity and Storm Data
http://www.freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/131.html

I finally made a decision on what type of Solid Earth Tide data to add to the data table on that Web page and probably have at least another day or two of computer programming to do in order to get things organized so that I can add those data to the table without having to do everything manually. But the following are a few comments on data which have already been generated. Some of them can presently be seen at that Web page.

*** At the moment I am “officially” using the “ac” and “am” data with my earthquake forecasts. But the “ag” data which I suspect may eventually be shown to be more accurate suggest to me that there could have been matches between the right Ear Tone detected on December 7 and the Kansas earthquake and between the left Ear Tone detected on December 9 and the Papua New Guinea earthquake.

*** The gravity data “t, a, and g” have about a 5 value (1 is low, 9 is high) indicating to me that gravity strength by itself was not important to those earthquakes being triggered.

*** If I am interpreting them properly, the Solid Earth Tide data for the Papua New Guinea earthquake (those data are not yet being stored on that Web page) show that there was a Solid Earth Tide trough at 158E longitude when the Papua New Guinea earthquake occurred at 153E longitude. And there was a Solid Earth Tide vertical acceleration upwards peak also at 158E longitude at that same time. What that indicates to me is that Solid Earth Tide type forces were probably involved with that earthquake being triggered.

*** None of the Solid Earth Tide data I am presently generating show any clear matches with the Kansas earthquake which was at 99W longitude.

*** The sun (slon) locations were nowhere near either of those earthquakes when they occurred. If I understand the theories you have discussed correctly, when the sun is directly over a fault zone, energy it transmits to the Earth in the form of photon type solar storms (X-rays etc.) might be able to trigger an earthquake in that fault zone. Because the sun was at a different location at those times that theory would therefore not apply here.

Does anyone know how long it takes electron, proton, and coronal mass ejection solar storm types of energy to reach the Earth? I would expect that there would be fairly large differences between their arrival times because of their mass and velocity differences. Not being an expert on the subject I am guessing that coronal mass ejection (CME) type storms can involve atomic nuclei larger than protons.

Once again, I need to focus on getting those Solid Earth Tide data generation and storage routines operational. And so at this time I cannot get into any lengthy conversations regarding this subject matter.

Follow Ups:
     ● That should be EQF, not RQF NT - EQF  23:22:57 - 12/13/2002  (17584)  (0)