Re: The past is the key to the future
Posted by Lowell on November 09, 2002 at 07:34:22:

My experience is that "coincidence" is the lazy person's way of explaining just about anything, but that true coincidence is really quite rare.

The e-mail which was cited above reached me on October 25, 2002, before the usenet forecast you have cited and it therefore predates that one. Nevertheless, it would be interesting to see what the usenet forecast was - was it extremely vague, or of some actual use (if anyone took note). There is almost always a forecast somewhere on the web for So. California, so it is not surprising that this period also was included.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: The past is the key to the future - 2cents  21:06:52 - 11/9/2002  (17306)  (0)
     ● Alaska ground rupture, statistics - chris in suburbia  13:34:37 - 11/9/2002  (17297)  (1)
        ● Re: Alaska ground rupture, statistics - Roger Hunter  15:10:55 - 11/9/2002  (17301)  (1)
           ● more specific - chris in suburbia  19:03:20 - 11/9/2002  (17303)  (1)
              ● Re: more specific - Lowell  23:41:53 - 11/9/2002  (17308)  (1)
                 ● Re: more specific - chris in suburbia  10:39:29 - 11/10/2002  (17312)  (2)
                    ● Re: more specific - Lowell  14:21:07 - 11/10/2002  (17314)  (0)
                    ● Re: more specific - Roger Hunter  12:16:04 - 11/10/2002  (17313)  (1)
                       ● Re: more specific - chris in suburbia  14:26:06 - 11/10/2002  (17315)  (1)
                          ● Re: more specific - Roger Hunter  16:32:20 - 11/10/2002  (17321)  (0)