Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000)
Posted by 2cents on June 11, 2002 at 18:32:41:

Roger:

You said:

"The rockburst should show down; it's an IMplosion."

So therefore the event at 19:41 was an earthquake correct (per CNSS)? (They should have been able to discern an IMplosion (showing down) assuming that had a teleseismic array up and runnning). Therefore they had an earthquake at 2 km and a "rockburst" at 1.56 km depth in the same area?
Hmmm...what are the odds of that ?

"Can't believe everything you read, ya know?"

That is soooo true...:-)




Follow Ups:
     ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - Roger Hunter  19:11:38 - 6/11/2002  (16019)  (1)
        ● Re: New ways to predict quakes (29 Nov. 2000) - 2cents  21:07:42 - 6/11/2002  (16020)  (0)