tax contest update
Posted by Roger Hunter on April 28, 2002 at 12:25:57:

Hi all;

CNSS has finally added NEIC data so I thought I'd run the tax
day contest evaluation to see if there were any surprises.

I don't recall the actual winner but this whole exercise is a good example of why evaluation must be postponed.

My program is not well suited to contests. I think in the future I will restrict it to providing probabilities for the contestants. That will let me use a larger database and give (hopefully) better answers.



1 Carol
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 37.8 -122.6 2.5 9.9 50 Prob. 4.10%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
DATE TIME LAT LON MAG DIST(km) PROB.
2002/04/14 11:36:57.33 37.5982 -122.4497 26.0 62.8%
2002/04/14 17:19:00.94 37.5495 -118.8008 2.68 335.2 94.4%
2002/04/14 23:01:40.68 38.8035 -122.7853 2.74 112.7 40.2%
2002/04/15 04:53:34.57 40.3277 -121.6768 291.9 100%
2002/04/15 22:57:00.89 38.8450 -122.8105 3.41 117.5 46.1%
2002/04/16 07:26:52.35 37.5982 -122.4495 26.0 62.8%
2002/04/16 08:43:37.53 37.6015 -122.4615 25.2 62.8%
2002/04/16 10:15:31.60 37.0357 -117.9760 3.05 416.7 98.5%


There are no perfect fits for this prediction.


Best date 2002/04/15 04:53:34.57 40.3277 -121.6768 .50
Best dist 2002/04/16 08:43:37.53 37.6015 -122.4615 25.19
Best size 2002/04/15 22:57:00.89 38.8450 -122.8105 3.41 3.41
Best prob 2002/04/14 23:01:40.68 38.8035 -122.7853 2.74 40.230%


2 Carol
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 33.26 -116.35 2.5 9.9 50 Prob. 19.5%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
DATE TIME LAT LON MAG DIST(km) PROB.
2002/04/14 17:19:00.94 37.5495 -118.8008 2.68 525.6 99.1%
2002/04/16 03:49:20.81 32.8998 -115.5213 2.69 86.9 48.6%
2002/04/16 10:15:31.60 37.0357 -117.9760 3.05 444.7 98.0%


There are no perfect fits for this prediction.


Best date 2002/04/16 03:49:20.81 32.8998 -115.5213 2.69 .50
Best dist 2002/04/16 03:49:20.81 32.8998 -115.5213 2.69 86.91
Best size 2002/04/16 10:15:31.60 37.0357 -117.9760 3.05 3.05
Best prob 2002/04/16 03:49:20.81 32.8998 -115.5213 2.69 48.604%


3 Cathryn
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 17.436 -64.53 4.6 6 120 Prob. 0.164%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
None found.


4 Cathryn
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 33.666 -95.54762 3 60 Prob. 0%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
None found.


5 Petra Challus
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 37.69 -91.8 1.2 2.2 166.7 Prob. 0.164%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
None found.


6 Petra Challus
2002/4 /14 - 2002/4 /16 33.4 -94.2 1.2 2.2 166.7 Prob.0%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
None found.


7 Don Unofficial
2002/4 /11 - 2002/4 /15 -39 174.3 3 4 65 Prob. 8.74%


The following quakes match the prediction to some degree.
DATE TIME LAT LON MAG DIST(km) PROB.
2002/04/14 23:49:44.00 -39.9200 174.4300 102.8 41.2%
2002/04/16 10:12:50.90 -38.9200 174.7100 36.5 58.6%
2002/04/16 10:59:17.20 -38.8200 175.8900 4.30 138.9 70.6%
2002/04/16 10:59:17.20 -38.8200 175.8900 138.9 82.6%


There are no perfect fits for this prediction.


Best date 2002/04/14 23:49:44.00 -39.9200 174.4300 .50
Best dist 2002/04/16 10:12:50.90 -38.9200 174.7100 36.52
Best size 2002/04/16 10:59:17.20 -38.8200 175.8900 4.30 4.30
Best prob 2002/04/14 23:49:44.00 -39.9200 174.4300 41.257%


Roger

PS: Tomorrow is my last day until May 15th.
Vacation!!


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: tax contest update - Lowell  13:51:23 - 4/28/2002  (15302)  (1)
        ● Re: tax contest update - Roger Hunter  13:56:04 - 4/28/2002  (15303)  (1)
           ● Re: tax contest update - Petra Challus  14:51:58 - 4/28/2002  (15306)  (1)
              ● Re: tax contest update - Cathryn  15:58:37 - 4/28/2002  (15308)  (0)