Hi Roger,

Hope you are having doubt and integrity of Red Phuma and EMSC data when
you are doing evaluation purposes though Lowell has quoted the data in
his Earthquake Summary for April 5, 2002 for Asia. May be your experience.
But Lowell has taken ASC data for my Gujarat quake too. If you guide me
to which organisation results are 100% OK then I follow them if I think
correct. Though I have given the time window, but you have given
unnecessary data pertains to last week March in your message.

According to 2 cents, I am targeting the foreshock area. Not at all. Is any
rigid theory stating that the period of foreshocks after a particular
quake? Please note that the settlement of crust after a main shock was unable
to registered through sunlight method but at the same time formation of fresh
quake on the same area along with its present magnitude are noticed and that
is the plus point of this method.

Generally, if stick on to particular style of evaluation, it is very difficult
to deviate to a new idea though it is meaningful.

SHAN
7/4/02