That's better
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 27, 2002 at 11:56:13:

What do you think?

Is this clear to everyone or is something else needed?

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: That's better - EQF  15:05:01 - 3/27/2002  (14273)  (0)
     ● Re: That's better - Lowell  11:57:22 - 3/27/2002  (14259)  (1)
        ● Re: That's better - Don In Hollister  13:03:11 - 3/27/2002  (14265)  (2)
           ● Re: That's better - Lowell  13:26:27 - 3/27/2002  (14267)  (0)
           ● Re: That's better - Lowell  13:22:20 - 3/27/2002  (14266)  (1)
              ● Re: That's better - Lowell  14:50:55 - 3/27/2002  (14270)  (0)