Re: March contest revised again
Posted by Roger Hunter on March 26, 2002 at 10:48:34:

Hi EQF;

Suggestion noted but not needed.

Such documentation is already in the works, but FIRST I gotta be sure the bloody thing is working the way it's supposed to.

T think it is but I'm not 100% sure yet. These contests are a good way to turn up the bugs.

In the interim, what do you not understand about the output?

Roger

Follow Ups:
     ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  11:02:03 - 3/26/2002  (14148)  (1)
        ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  11:59:11 - 3/26/2002  (14154)  (2)
           ● Re: March contest revised again - Canie  22:08:36 - 3/26/2002  (14191)  (1)
              ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  04:55:50 - 3/27/2002  (14201)  (0)
           ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  12:16:16 - 3/26/2002  (14162)  (1)
              ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  12:25:13 - 3/26/2002  (14165)  (1)
                 ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  12:28:15 - 3/26/2002  (14166)  (1)
                    ● Re: March contest revised again - Roger Hunter  16:15:10 - 3/26/2002  (14177)  (1)
                       ● Re: March contest revised again - Lowell  19:13:46 - 3/26/2002  (14183)  (0)