|
|
|
Re: Eyeopener
|
Posted by Lowell on March 21, 2002 at 11:46:44:
Duplication: A list of preferred networks for each region is used. Usually the network closest to the event is expected to have the best local coverage and that is the location used. For large teleseismic events, local magnitudes are usually lousy, and we use data obtained first from NEIS, then GSR and down the line. Comparison of the final epicenters after some time has elapsed has allowed a reasonable idea of which quick sources are best for which regions. Availability Since no funds are used to maintain this database (an unpaid slave does the work) the availability is subject to political considerations. NOAA does not wish to be seen as in competition with the USGS in terms of earthquake catalogs and does not consider this an essential part of their mission. The catalog is mostly used for internal programs and data, but is available to engineering firms and others wishing to do seismic studies. We spent a year last year trying to get the catalog on line with limited success. The problem is that there are too many sub catalogs and too many events for searches to be done quickly enough so as not to tie up the system. There are no current plans to make this data available on-line. Accuracy: Accuracy is suspect for any immediate events. We have found, however, that in recent years, the accuracy of locally determined epicenters is usually quite good after the first manual review, and of teleseismic reporters within at least two hours, provided the center is open at the time of the earthquake. Within a day, therefore, most epicenters are determined as well as they will be in the final analysis by someone on the web. Local networks, of course have the advantage that if an earthquake is felt, they know about it immediately and initial epicenters would usually be better than expected by teleseismic agencies. There are some networks (like NORSAR) which issue teleseismic locations which should never be used as they are simply too inaccurate. Accuracy is a big issue and is addressed by checking the epicentral data every several hours for the first day and then after a week taking the final solution.
Follow Ups:
● Re: Eyeopener - Roger Hunter 12:06:13 - 3/21/2002 (13986) (0)
|
|
|