Re: Kunlun - Pak nuke site and recent eqs
Posted by 2cents on January 05, 2002 at 12:41:14:

Chris: Well...Ok ...I see your point.

How about this:

2002/01/03 07:05:38.2 37.6N 69.9E 120 Mb6.3 M SED AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BDR REG
2002/01/03 07:05:30.4 37.6N 69.1E 10 Mb6.2 A SED AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BDR REG
2002/01/03 07:05:29.0 37.1N 69.3E Mm5.4 A LOR AFGHANISTAN-TAJIKISTAN BDR REG
2002/01/03 07:05:26.8 36.0N 70.8E 119 Mb5.7 M NEIR HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:26.7 36.0N 70.8E 120 M 6.1 M GSSC HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:26.7 36.0N 70.8E 120 A GSSA HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:24.0 36.1N 70.9E 100 Mb5.7 A MIX HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:16.7 36.0N 70.9E 33 Mb6.0 M+ CSEM HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:16.5 35.9N 70.9E 33G Mb5.8 A NEIA HINDU KUSH, AFGHANISTAN, REG
2002/01/03 07:05:15.0 34.0N 70.0E Mb6.0 A: LED SOUTHEASTERN AFGHANISTAN
2002/01/03 07:04:59.1 35.0N 73.5E M 6.4 A INGV NORTHWESTERN KASHMIR

2002/01/03 07:04:58.7 33.4N 71.8E 33 Mb6.3 A! NOR PAKISTAN

Note the Pakistan Nuke test site here:
740518 023455.4 INRAJ UNDG 4.9 15 26.99 N 071.80 E P I

Note the longitude similarity with the Pak Nuke test site, the recent Pak earthquake, Mb6.3, and all the earthquakes further up in latitude recently.

Your argument above presumes that since Nuke tests are not likely to trigger quakes especially at 500 km then it it's even more unlikely that "recent bombings" (daisy cutters, etc.) could not have triggered the quakes in that region above....so this then too must also just be a coincidence.... ( Or is it? ) Just something to think about....

.03



Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Kunlun - Pak nuke site and recent eqs - Canie  23:11:27 - 1/5/2002  (12430)  (1)
        ● Re: Kunlun - Pak nuke site and recent eqs - 2cents  18:34:08 - 1/6/2002  (12448)  (1)
           ● Re: Kunlun - Pak nuke site and recent eqs - Canie  20:37:51 - 1/6/2002  (12449)  (0)
     ● PAK EQ felt across 740 km (400 miles) - 2cents  21:02:41 - 1/5/2002  (12429)  (0)