Re: Earthquake Forecasting Resources Web Page
Posted by Petra Challus on January 01, 2002 at 23:53:22:

Hi EDG,

You said:
"Although Ear Tones like that have been discussed at length in Internet Bulletin Board notes and elsewhere over the years, as far as I am aware, at the present time relatively little is known about the source and nature of the signals or how they are able to interact with the human body and mind and be perceived as distinct sounds."

I disagree.

Some things are certain; if you stand to close to a fire you'll get burned, if you stand in the middle of a volcano you may have a ride you never expected and in regard to ear tones, if you will listen and read you'll find more is known than you realize.

You don't need a high tech instruments, computer programs or any of that stuff, what you need is people who pay attention. While I have my own thing going which seems to have developed in a positive direction I haven't stopped reading and listening to others who also have the same abilities I do. I'm still learning from them.

I would like to invite you and anyone else who is interested in the ear tone phenomena to take a ride on the Internet. Hop over to Jim Berklands site or check out Critical Earthquake Windows and in time you'll find correlating tones which will centralize the larger quakes into one area. It happens frequently.

But as for global events being forecasted by those living in CA I'm not certain there is anything definitive at this time. It has been a long held interest of mine to find people who live in seismically active zones around the world and locate other tone sensitives for work in their own countries. These would be far more accurate than people who live in the US.

I am aware of three countries where there are other tone sensitives, but I do not personally have contact with them, though I would like to.

Ear tones are far easier to understand when you don't try to nit pick all of the details. Does it really matter whether this is a true sound or a vibration that is perceived as a sound? Not really. What is important is locating the faults that are delivering the sounds and understanding what it is about each fault that delivers this noise. Why do quakes arrive sooner from some faults than others? Why are some tones not matched quickly to an earthquake?

These are the important questions in my opinion.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Earthquake Forecasting Resources Web Page - EQF  00:48:43 - 1/2/2002  (12354)  (1)
        ● Re: Earthquake Forecasting Resources Web Page - Petra Challus  14:04:30 - 1/2/2002  (12371)  (0)